Skip to content
HOOGResearch & Advisory

Mobility & Automotive

OEM Perception and Share-of-Business Study for an Auto Supplier

Understanding how OEM purchasing and engineering teams rate the supplier and what would win more programmes.

Example engagement
Client
Automotive component supplier
Industry
Mobility & Automotive
Geography
India, Europe and the US
Duration
8 weeks
Capabilities
B2B Research, Competitive Intelligence

Research design at a glance

How the work is structured

India, Europe and the US · 8 weeks

  1. 1

    OEM stakeholder interviews

    Purchasing, R&D and quality leaders.

  2. 2

    Supplier scorecard benchmarking

    Performance versus named competitors.

  3. 3

    Expert interviews

    Former OEM executives.

  4. 4

    Technology roadmap review

    Platform transitions and requirements.

Qualitative depth

Interviews, groups & observation

  • OEM stakeholder interviews~25
  • Expert interviews~6

Sample sizes are indicative of a typical design for this type of question; real engagements are scoped to the decision.

01

Client context

The supplier had long OEM relationships but was losing new platform nominations to competitors.

02

Business challenge

Feedback from OEMs came informally through sales and was hard to act on.

03

Research objective & questions

Measure OEM perceptions against competitors and identify the levers to win new programmes.

  • How do OEM purchasing, engineering and quality teams rate the supplier?
  • Which factors decide new programme nominations?
  • How do competitors perform on those factors?
  • What capabilities do OEMs need for electric and connected platforms?

04

Methodology & approach

OEM stakeholder interviews
Purchasing, R&D and quality leaders.
Supplier scorecard benchmarking
Performance versus named competitors.
Expert interviews
Former OEM executives.
Technology roadmap review
Platform transitions and requirements.

05

Sample & geography

  • ~25 OEM stakeholder interviews
  • ~6 expert interviews
  • Geography — India, Europe and the US

06

Key findings

  • Quality and delivery performance were strong; engineering co-development was the gap.
  • Competitors engaged OEM R&D earlier in the platform cycle.
  • OEMs wanted suppliers with electric-platform capability and local testing.
  • Cost competitiveness was necessary but not decisive.

07

Business implications

  • Build a dedicated co-development and early-engagement team.
  • Invest in electric-platform engineering and testing capability.
  • Present a structured technology roadmap to key OEMs.

08

Outcome

The supplier received an OEM perception scorecard, competitor comparison and programme-win action plan.

Example engagement — Shows how Hoog approaches this type of question. Not a specific client project. Findings are directional.

Start a conversation

Facing a similar question?

Tell us about the decision you are facing. We will come back with a clear view of how research can help — and what it would take.