Skip to content
HOOGResearch & Advisory

Retail & E-commerce

Catchment and Site Selection Study for an Electronics Retailer

Ranking cities and sites for new stores after several recent openings underperformed.

Example engagement
Client
Consumer electronics retail chain
Industry
Retail & E-commerce
Geography
India (tier-2 cities)
Duration
7 weeks
Capabilities
Market Entry & GTM, Market Intelligence

Research design at a glance

How the work is structured

India (tier-2 cities) · 7 weeks

  1. 1

    Catchment analysis

    Population, income and housing data around each candidate site.

  2. 2

    Competitor mapping

    Nearby electronics stores and brand outlets.

  3. 3

    Local shopper survey

    Shopping habits and travel distance in each city.

  4. 4

    Underperforming store review

    Interviews with store managers and shoppers.

Qualitative depth

Interviews, groups & observation

  • Candidate sites~30

Quantitative scale

Surveys, audits & measurement

  • Shopper survey responses~1,200

Coverage

Markets, competitors or targets assessed

  • Cities screened~12

Sample sizes are indicative of a typical design for this type of question; real engagements are scoped to the decision.

01

Client context

The retailer planned to open new stores across tier-2 cities.

02

Business challenge

Site choices had relied on rent and availability rather than demand, and some stores struggled.

03

Research objective & questions

Build a demand-based approach to rank cities and sites and recommend store formats.

  • Which cities and areas have the strongest demand for electronics?
  • How far will shoppers travel, and to which competitors?
  • Which format and store size suits each site?
  • Why did recent stores underperform?

04

Methodology & approach

Catchment analysis
Population, income and housing data around each candidate site.
Competitor mapping
Nearby electronics stores and brand outlets.
Local shopper survey
Shopping habits and travel distance in each city.
Underperforming store review
Interviews with store managers and shoppers.

05

Sample & geography

  • ~12 cities screened
  • ~30 candidate sites
  • ~1,200 shopper survey responses
  • Geography — India (tier-2 cities)

06

Key findings

  • Underperforming stores were in areas with strong brand-outlet competition.
  • Shoppers travelled further for large-format stores with wide ranges.
  • Several cities could support only a smaller format.
  • Financing and exchange offers drove store choice more than price.

07

Business implications

  • Rank sites by demand and competition, not rent alone.
  • Use a smaller format in lower-demand cities.
  • Lead local marketing with financing and exchange offers.

08

Outcome

The retailer received a site ranking model, catchment profiles and format recommendations.

Example engagement — Shows how Hoog approaches this type of question. Not a specific client project. Findings are directional.

Start a conversation

Facing a similar question?

Tell us about the decision you are facing. We will come back with a clear view of how research can help — and what it would take.